Vibe Learning
How can I use AI to learn better?
The learner sets goals, asks questions, practises, reflects and checks whether they can apply knowledge independently.
Vibe Teaching · By Laurence Svekis
Design guided, active learning experiences where AI supports the educator and the learner builds real understanding.
Vibe Teaching is Laurence Svekis’s approach to using AI to design and guide active learning. Educators set the goals, shape the experience and judge the evidence of understanding. AI supports explanations, questioning, practice and feedback. Learners remain responsible for thinking, making decisions and demonstrating what they know.
It is for teachers, tutors, trainers, facilitators and course creators who want to move beyond generating lesson content toward helping people develop real capability.
I’m Laurence Svekis, an educator, developer and author. I began working in online education in 2001. After seeing the emergence of vibe coding in 2025, I began asking how conversational AI could support a more structured way to learn.
I coined the term Vibe Learning for my approach to AI-assisted learning and developed the Vibe Learning Framework. Shortly afterward, I began using Vibe Teaching for its educator-facing counterpart: a method of using AI to teach, guide practice and support understanding.
My vision is to give educators more ways to respond to learners while preserving the curiosity, effort and judgment that make learning meaningful.
Read about Laurence and the framework →How can I use AI to learn better?
The learner sets goals, asks questions, practises, reflects and checks whether they can apply knowledge independently.
How can I use AI to help someone else learn better?
The educator designs the questions, challenges, feedback and assessment that help learners build understanding.
Both share a central principle: use AI to strengthen human thinking.
AI can produce material quickly. The educator decides whether that material is accurate, appropriate and useful for the learning goal.
Provides purpose, subject knowledge, empathy, standards and judgment. Decides when to guide, when to challenge and what counts as progress.
Contributes curiosity, effort, explanations, attempts, decisions and reflection. Builds and demonstrates their own understanding.
Helps draft examples, questions, scenarios and feedback for review. Can suggest alternative explanations and practice tasks.
Use these eight moves as a flexible lesson-design loop. Return to earlier steps when learner responses reveal a gap.
Define what learners should be able to do and what evidence will show it.
Connect the concept to prior knowledge using explanations, examples and questions.
Ask learners to commit to an idea before revealing an answer or outcome.
Give learners something meaningful to solve, build, write, explain or decide.
Identify a specific gap, offer the smallest useful hint and invite another attempt.
Ask learners to reconstruct key ideas without AI or reference material.
Relate the new idea to another topic, experience or situation.
Change the context and check whether learners can apply the idea independently.
Goal: Learners can write and explain a condition that checks whether a person is eligible for a discount.
The evidence is the learner’s code, explanation and handling of a new case—not the quality of the AI-generated answer.
Replace the bracketed details. Review AI output for accuracy, suitability and alignment before using it with learners.
Help me design a Vibe Teaching lesson on [topic] for [learner level]. The learning goal is [observable capability]. We have [time]. Include a prior-knowledge question, a prediction task, a short explanation, independent practice, feedback, recall without AI, and a transfer task. For each step, state what the learner does and what evidence I should observe. Flag factual claims I should verify. Do not provide solutions in the learner handout.
Act as a guided practice partner for [topic]. Ask one question at a time. First ask me to explain my current thinking. If I make a mistake, give the smallest useful hint and let me try again. Do not reveal the complete solution immediately. After a successful attempt, ask me to explain why it works and try a new case.
Create an assessment for [learning goal] at [learner level]. Include an explanation question, a misconception to diagnose, a practical task, and a new situation requiring transfer. Separate learner questions from teacher guidance and suggested answers. Provide observable criteria for understanding and partial understanding. Include a short independent check completed without AI. Use fictional examples and no identifiable learner information.
These prompts are starting points. A chatbot may not follow every instruction; the educator remains responsible for the experience.
Choose a lesson you already teach. Keep its learning goal, add one prediction question, replace one immediate answer with a hint, and finish with an independent transfer task. Compare the learner’s first and final attempts to decide what to adjust next.
Laurence Svekis developed this approach as the educator-facing counterpart to his Vibe Learning concept and framework, beginning to use the term shortly after developing Vibe Learning in 2025.
The educator directs the learning experience and judges learner progress. AI supports the educator with material, questions and practice ideas.
Vibe Teaching focuses on what the learner does: predicting, attempting, explaining, recalling and transferring knowledge. Generating lesson content is only one possible supporting activity.
No. An educator can use AI during planning and deliver the resulting activities without requiring learners to use a chatbot.
Yes. The learning loop can guide lessons in writing, languages, science, workplace training and other subjects. Adapt tasks and evidence to the subject and learner.
No. The framework and linked tools provide practical guidance; they do not confer a teaching qualification.